#nucleic acid extraction

[creativeera]

DNA and RNA Sample Preparation Market is Estimated to Witness High Growth Owing to Increasing Adoption

The DNA and RNA sample preparation market involves processes associated with isolation, extraction, purification and quantification of nucleic acids DNA and RNA from various sources like tissues, blood, sperm, cells etc. for downstream applications in genomics, molecular diagnostics, personalized medicine and others. The sample preparation is a critical and initial step before conducting various genomic tests including Next Generation Sequencing, polymerase chain reaction and other assays. Growing awareness and adoption of precision medicine and genetic/molecular testing is driving demand for efficient nucleic acid isolation and downstream analysis.

The Global DNA and RNA Sample Preparation Market is estimated to be valued at US$ 2262.46 Mn in 2024 and is expected to exhibit a CAGR of 5.8% over the forecast period 2024 To 2031. Key Takeaways Key players operating in the DNA and RNA sample preparation are Agilent Technologies, Inc., Becton, Dickinson and Company, Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., DiaSorin S.p.A, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Miroculus, Inc., Illumina, Inc., PerkinElmer, Inc., QIAGEN, Sigma Aldrich Corp., Tecan Group AG, and Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. Growing prominence of personalized medicine is creating opportunities for development of new sample preparation methods and kits which can extract nucleic acids from various types of samples. Rising incidence of chronic and infectious diseases worldwide is increasing diagnostic testing which will propel sample preparation market growth. Global expansion of key market players through acquisitions and partnerships with regional diagnostic labs and research institutes will further augment market revenues. Market Drivers Increasing funding for Genomic and genetic research from government bodies as well as private sector is one of the key factors driving the DNA and RNA Sample Preparation Market Size. Government initiatives aimed at large scale population screening and clinical testing for various genetic disorders, infectious diseases and cancers are also creating demand for high throughput nucleic acid preparation. Growing geriatric population and rising healthcare spending in developing nations also provides growth opportunities for market players in the forecast period.

PEST Analysis Political: Laws and regulations imposed by governments for research using DNA and RNA samples could impact the market. Changes in healthcare policies will also have effects. Economic: Factors like GDP growth, income levels, healthcare spending will drive demand. Rise in research activities and focus on precision medicine boost the market. Social: Growing awareness about personalized medicine and importance of genetic testing are important. Social trends also promote preventive healthcare and wellness. Technological: Advancements in fields like next generation sequencing, lab automation, bioinformatics are key for market growth. Miniaturization and portability of equipment expand applications. Developments in sample collection and storage methods improve efficiency. Geographical regions where the market in terms of value is concentrated include North America and Europe. North America accounts for the largest share in the global market due to presence of well-established healthcare industry and research institutes. Europe also captures notable share due to growing biotech sector and research funding. The Asia Pacific region is projected to be the fastest growing market during the forecast period. This is attributed to factors such as increasing healthcare expenditure, growing awareness, expanding biotech industry and rising government investments in research. Countries like China, India offer growth opportunities as they focus on healthcare infrastructure development.

Get more insights on DNA And RNA Sample Preparation Market

Also read related article on Surgical Robots Market

Discover the Report for More Insights, Tailored to Your Language

French

German

Italian

Russian

Japanese

Chinese

Korean

Portuguese

Vaagisha brings over three years of expertise as a content editor in the market research domain. Originally a creative writer, she discovered her passion for editing, combining her flair for writing with a meticulous eye for detail. Her ability to craft and refine compelling content makes her an invaluable asset in delivering polished and engaging write-ups.

(LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/vaagisha-singh-8080b91)

[pathologylab]

Introducing Rapi-X96, fully automated #Nucleic Acid Extraction System that revolutionizes sample processing with its magnetic bead-based #technology and 96-well plate format, enabling simultaneous extraction of 96 samples. This advanced system uses #magnetic beads and buffer reagents to separate and purify high-quality nucleic acids from various sample sources, including blood, #tissues, viruses, and body fluids.

#G2M Rapi-X96 extraction #system ensures efficient and high-quality nucleic acid extraction, streamlining your laboratory workflow and enhancing productivity.

Contact us at social@genes2me.com or +91 8800821778 if you need any further assistance !

Visit our website for more information: https://www.genes2me.com/nucleic-acid-extraction-system

#extraction #purification #automated #nucleicacid #buffer #genes2me #blood #sources

[mrunalijadhav]

Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction System Market Drivers and Technological Advancements to Watch in 2025

The Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction System market has seen considerable growth over the past few years. This growth can be attributed to several factors that drive the adoption of automated nucleic acid extraction technologies across various industries, including diagnostics, research, and pharmaceuticals. In this article, we will explore the key drivers contributing to the expansion of this market.

Increasing Demand for Efficient Diagnostic Solutions

The rise in the number of chronic and infectious diseases globally has significantly increased the demand for diagnostic solutions that offer speed and accuracy. Traditional manual methods of nucleic acid extraction can be time-consuming, error-prone, and labor-intensive. Automated systems, on the other hand, offer a faster and more consistent alternative, ensuring that diagnostic tests are both efficient and accurate. The shift toward automation is being fueled by the need for quick, reliable diagnostics in fields like molecular biology, clinical diagnostics, and oncology.

Advancements in Technology and Integration with Other Platforms

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into nucleic acid extraction systems has enhanced their functionality and efficiency. These technologies help automate several aspects of the extraction process, improving accuracy and reducing the chances of human error. Additionally, the development of more sophisticated software systems that can control multiple stages of nucleic acid extraction has also played a pivotal role in driving market growth. As technology advances, automated systems are becoming more reliable and customizable, catering to the unique needs of different industries.

Rise in Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Research

The biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors are key drivers of the automated nucleic acid extraction system market. Research and development (R&D) activities within these industries require consistent and high-quality extraction of nucleic acids for the creation of new drugs, vaccines, and therapies. Automated systems allow researchers to process large volumes of samples quickly and with a higher degree of precision, leading to faster drug discovery and more effective therapeutic interventions. As the biotechnology industry continues to grow, the demand for automated nucleic acid extraction systems is expected to rise.

Focus on Improving Laboratory Productivity and Reducing Errors

Automated systems are seen as essential for improving laboratory productivity and reducing errors. With automation, laboratory technicians can focus on more complex tasks, while the system handles routine processes such as nucleic acid extraction. This results in improved efficiency, higher throughput, and a reduction in human errors. Moreover, automated systems help labs handle large volumes of samples simultaneously, which is crucial for research and clinical settings that deal with a significant number of tests. This focus on productivity and error reduction continues to fuel the adoption of automated nucleic acid extraction systems.

Government Initiatives and Funding for Healthcare Innovations

Governments across the globe are investing heavily in healthcare innovations to improve public health and support research initiatives. Funding and grants are often provided to support the development of new medical technologies, including automated nucleic acid extraction systems. Governments are particularly focused on supporting innovations that enhance diagnostic capabilities and improve the efficiency of healthcare delivery. These investments are not only accelerating the development of automated extraction systems but also making them more affordable and accessible to healthcare providers worldwide. With ongoing support from government bodies, the adoption of automated nucleic acid extraction systems is set to increase further.

Expanding Applications in Clinical and Forensic Laboratories

Automated nucleic acid extraction systems have found applications in clinical diagnostics, forensic investigations, and even environmental testing. In clinical labs, they are used for genetic testing, disease detection, and monitoring of infectious diseases. In forensic labs, these systems help in the extraction of DNA from crime scene samples, facilitating criminal investigations. The expanding range of applications across various industries is contributing to the market's growth. The ability to process diverse samples efficiently and with high reliability is a key factor in the increasing adoption of these systems.

Emerging Markets and Adoption in Developing Countries

While the adoption of automated nucleic acid extraction systems has been high in developed countries, emerging markets, especially in Asia-Pacific and Latin America, are showing increased interest in these technologies. As these regions continue to modernize their healthcare infrastructure and research facilities, the demand for automated systems is expected to surge. Healthcare providers in developing countries are increasingly recognizing the value of automation in improving diagnostic capabilities and operational efficiency. This growing awareness and investment in automation in emerging markets are key drivers of the global market.

Conclusion

The Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction System market is poised for continued growth due to a variety of drivers. These include the increasing demand for efficient diagnostic solutions, advancements in technology, and a growing focus on improving productivity and reducing errors. Moreover, the ongoing support from governments and the expanding applications in clinical and forensic settings further contribute to market expansion. As these systems become more advanced and accessible, their adoption is set to accelerate, reshaping the landscape of nucleic acid extraction.

[jamalgrimes]

Best Practices for Selecting a Nucleic Acid Extraction Kit

Selecting the best nucleic acid extraction kit for DNA and RNA isolation is crucial for obtaining reliable and reproducible results in molecular biology applications. By considering factors such as sample type, nucleic acid requirements, extraction methods, and kit performance, you can choose a kit that ensures the highest quality of isolated nucleic acids.

Whether you’re working with clinical samples, research specimens, or microbial cultures, understanding these considerations will help you streamline your nucleic acid extraction process and achieve accurate results in your experiments.

[o-craven-canto]

Rough timeline of the discovery of genes and DNA

(mostly condensed from the first half of S. Mukherjee, The Gene: An Intimate History, 2016, and this 1974 paper)

1857-1864: Gregor Mendel experiments with breeding peas at the monastery of Brno. The results show that information about flower color, pod shape etc. is transmitted in discrete blocks that do not mix, and can persist unexpressed in a generation to manifest again in the next.

1865-1866: Mendel's results are published in a minor journal and effectively forgotten for 35 years. He corresponds with physiologist Carl von Nägeli, who dismisses them as "only empirical" (???).

1868: Unaware of Mendel's work, Darwin proposes pangenesis as mechanism of heredity: every body part produces "gemmules" that carry hereditary information and merge to form gametes. This does not explain how new traits aren't immediately diluted out of existence, or why acquired changes aren't inheritable.

1869: Friedrich Miescher extracts a mysterious substance from pus on used bandages and salmon sperm. He calls it nuclein (later: chromatin), as it seems to be concentrated in cell nuclei.

1878: Albrecht Kossel separates nuclein into protein and a non-protein component, which he calls nucleic acid, and breaks it down in five nucleotides.

1882: Darwin dies, bothered -- among other things -- by the lack of a plausible mechanism to transmit new variation. Legend has it that Mendel's paper lay on a bookshelf of his study, unread.

1883: August Weissmann, noting that mice with cut tails always give birth to fully-tailed mice, theorizes that hereditary information is contained in a "germplasm" fully isolated from the rest of the body, contra pangenesis. At each generation, only germplasm is transmitted, and gives separate rise to a somatic line, i.e. the body, which isn't.

ca. 1890: Studying sea urchin embryos in Naples, Theodor Boveri and Wilhelm von Waldeyer-Hartz notice large coiled masses of nuclein inside cell nuclei which can be dyed blue with aniline. They call them chromosomes, literally "colorful bodies". Simultaneously, Walter Sutton discovers chromosomes in grasshopper sperm.

1897: Hugo de Vries, after collecting hundreds of "monstrous" plant varieties near Amsterdam, realizes (also unaware of Mendel's work) that each trait is due to a single discrete particle of information, never mixing with the others, which he calls pangene in homage to Darwin. He also notices the appearance of completely new variants, which he calls mutants. In the same year, Carl Correns -- a former student of Nägeli, who had completely neglected to mention Mendel's work -- reproduces it exactly in Tubingen with pea and maize plants.

1900: Having finally found out about Mendel's publication, De Vries rushes to publish his model before he can be accused of plagiarism, which happens anyway. Correns does the same. Erich von Tschermak-Seysenegg also independently recreates Mendel's results with pea plants in Vienna. Come on, guys, this is embarassing.

1902: Boveri and Sutton independently propose that hereditary information is carried by chromosomes. Supporters of this hypothesis generally hold that information is carried by proteins, with the simpler nucleic acids (only 5 nucleotides vs. 20 aminoacids) serving as scaffold.

1905: William Bateson coins the word genetics to describe the field growing mostly from De Vries' work. He realizes it should be possible to deliberately select organisms for specific individual genes. Meanwhile, Boveri's student Nettie Stevens discovers in mealworms a strangely small chromosome that is found only in males -- chromosome Y. This is the first direct evidence that chromosomes do, in fact, carry genetic information.

1905-1908: Thomas Hunt Morgan and his students breed and cross thousands of fruit flies in a lab in New York. Contra Mendel, they notice that traits are not passed down in a completely independent way: for example, male sex and white eyes usually manifest together. This suggests that their information particles are attached to each other, so that the physically-closest traits are more likely (but not guaranteed!) to be transmitted together.

1909: Phoebus Levene and his coworkers break down nucleic acids by hydrolysis into sugars, phosphate, and nucleobases. They assume that nucleobases must repeat along a chain in a repetitive sequence. In a treatise on heredity, Wilhelm Johannsen shortens "pangene" to gene. It's a purely theoretical construct, with no known material basis.

1911: Using Morgan's data on trait linkage, his student Alfred Sturtevant draws the first genetic map, locating several genes along a fruit fly chromosome. Genetic information now has a physical basis, although not yet a mechanism of transmission.

1918: Statistician Ronald Fisher proposes that traits appearing in continuous gradients, such as height, can still be explained by discrete genes if multiple genes contribute to a single trait, resolving an apparent contradiction. (Six genes for height, for example, are enough to produce the smooth bell curve noticed half a century earlier by Francis Galton.)

ca. 1920: Bacteriologist Frederick Griffith is studying two forms of pneumococcus, a "smooth" strain that produces deadly pneumonia in mice (and people) and a "rough" strain that is easily dispatched by immunity. He finds out that if live "rough" pneumococci are mixed with "smooth" ones killed by heat, the "rough" can somehow acquire the deadly "smooth" coating from the dead.

1926: Hermann Muller, another student of Morgan, finds out he can produce arbitrary amounts of new mutant flies by exposing their parents to X-rays.

1928: Griffith describes the acquired "transformation" of bacteria in an extremely obscure journal.

1929: Levene identifies the sugars in "yeast nucleic acid" and "thymus nucleic acid" as ribose and deoxyribose, respectively. The two will henceforth be known as ribonucleic acid (RNA) and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA).

ca. 1930: Theodosius Dobzhansky, who also had worked with Morgan, discovers in wild-caught fruit flies variations of wing size, eye structure etc. that are produced by genes arranged in different orders on the chromosome. This rearrangement is the first physical mechanism for mutation discovered.

1940: Oswald Avery repeats Griffith's experiments with pneumococci, looking for the "transforming principle". Filtering away the remains of the cell wall, dissolving lipids in alcohol, destroying proteins with heat and chloroform does not stop the transformation. A DNA-degrading enzyme, however, does. Therefore, it is DNA that carries genetic information.

1943: By mixing flies with different gene orders and raising the mixed populations at different temperatures, Dobzhansky shows that a particular gene order can respond to natural selection, increasing or decresing in frequency.

1944: Avery publishes his results on transforming DNA. Physicist Erwin Schrödinger writes a treatise (What Is Life?) in which he states, on purely theoretical ground, that genetic information must be carried by an "aperiodic crystal", stable enough to be transmitted, but with a sequence of sub-parts that never repeat.

1950: In Cambridge, Maurice Wilkins starts using X-ray diffraction to try and make a picture of the atomic structure of dried DNA (as Linus Pauling and Robert Corey had done earlier with proteins). He is later joined by Rosalind Franklin, who finds a way to make higher-quality pictures by keeping DNA in its hydrated state. By hydrolyzing DNA, Erwin Chargaff notes that the nucleobases A and T are always present in exactly the same amount, as if they were paired, and so are C and G -- but A/T and C/G can be different amounts.

1951: Pauling publishes a paper on the alpha-helix structure of proteins. Having attended talks by Wilkins and Franklin, James Watson and Francis Crick attempt to build a physical model of DNA, a triple helix with internal phosphate, but Franklin notes it's too unstable to survive.

1952: Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase mark the protein envelope of phage viruses with radioactive sulfur, and their DNA with radioactive phosphorus. The phosphorus, but not the sulfur, is transmitted to host bacteria and to the new generation of phages. This indicates that DNA is not just exchanged as "transforming principle", but passed down through generations.

1953: Pauling and Corey also propose a structure of DNA, but they make the same mistake as Watson and Crick. These receive from Wilkins an especially high-quality photo (taken in 1952 by either Franklin or her student Ray Gosling). Combining this picture with Chargaff's measurements, they conclude that DNA must be a double helix, with a sugar-phosphate chain outside, and nucleobases meeting in pairs on the inside (A with T, C with G). The complementary sequences of bases give a clear mechanism for the storage and replication of genetic information.

1950s: Jacques Monod and François Jacob grow the bacterium Escherichia coli alternately on glucose and lactose. While its DNA never changes, the RNA produced changes in step with the production of glucose-digesting and lactose-digesting enzymes. So DNA is not directly affected, but different sequences are copied onto RNA depending on need.

1958: Arthur Kornberg isolates DNA polymerase, the enzyme that builds new DNA strands in the correct sequence. By inserting into DNA a heavier isotope of nitrogen, Matthew Meselson and Franklin Stahl show that each strand remains intact, separating during replication and then serving as template for a new one.

1960: Sydney Brenner and Jacob purify messenger RNA from bacterial cells. This seems to copy the sequence of a single gene and carry it to ribosomes, where proteins are built. RNA must encode the sequence of aminoacids of a protein, presumably in sets of 3 nucleotides (the smallest that can specify 20 aminoacids).

1961-1966: Multiple labs working in parallel (Marshall Nirenberg-Heinrich Matthaei-Philip Leder, Har Khorana, Severo Ochoa) map every possible triplet of nucleotides to a corresponding aminoacid. Synthetic RNA is inserted into isolated bacterial ribosomes, and aminoacids are marked one at a time with radioactive carbon to check the sequence of the resulting proteins.

1970: Paul Berg and David Jackson manage to fuse DNA from two viruses into a single sequence ("recombinant DNA") using DNA-cutting enzymes extracted from bacteria.

1972-1973: Janet Mertz joins Berg and Jackson, and proposes inserting the recombinant DNA into the genome of E. coli, exploiting the bacterium for mass production. Herb Boyer and Stanley Cohen perform a similar experiment merging bacterial DNA, and linking it to an antibiotic-resistance gene so that the recombinant bacteria can be easily isolated.

1975-1977: Frederick Sanger isolates template strands of DNA to build new ones with DNA polymerase, but uses altered and marked nucleobases that stop polymerization. By doing so, then segregating the shortened sequences by length and recognizing their final base with fluorescence, it's possible to read the exact sequence of bases on a DNA strand.

[consult-sherlockholmes]

Hello, Mr. Holmes! How are you?

So, long story short, I ended up with an optical microscope in my room more or less 4 months ago, with 200 previously made slides (secured in a proper box), and lots of new ones too, for me to prepare myself. I love microbiology (it's one of my hyperfixations, curse my neurodivergency) and now I love it even more (my mother has had to drag me away from the microscope - I named it Wesley - in the middle of the night multiple times now).

After much conversation, I finally convinced my mom to buy me the proper equipment to prepare the slides!

So, I'm sending this ask to you, as I know you also have a microscope and that you use it a lot: what kind of equipment do you recommend me buying (gloves, scalpel blades, tints, etc), while still remembering that all of the stuff needs to stay in my room (properly taken cared of by me, of course)?

For example, I'm unsure if different dyes are used for different smears and specimens due to it's affinity (I've noticed that on 'organic matter' slides, images are usually tinted purple or pink, while on plant-based slides, images are usually tinted green and blue, with a few red structures.) Considering that I don't have access to a mortuary, I will mostly make plant slides. There must be a difference in the dyes then, right?

Sorry for the long text! Hope this isn't too much of a bother.

- a 17-year-old :)

Congratulations on your new light microscope. I do hope you get the best out of it. I am overjoyed that someone else appreciates the art of microscopy and microbiology.

However, you need to be careful to not strain your eyes. It is recommended to take breaks every 15 minutes to close your eyes or focus on something in the distance to reaccommodate your eyes. And get up every 40 minutes, stretch and correct your posture. And it is recommended to not use a microscope more than 5 hours per day. John has to chase me away from my microscope sometimes to take a break when I sit there for hours, my posture like a Caridea.

Concerning equipment, you will obviously need a scalpel or other sharp blade to make very thin slices of your specimen, as thin as possible. And forceps to move your samples (best just get a whole dissection kit it has everything). Obviously slides and coverslips, pipettes for the stains or water, maybe some tubes. A pen to label your slides. In many staining procedures ethanol or acetone is also used. A waste jar to safely dispose of any chemicals, but be careful what you mix. A rack for staining and containers. I would recommend nitrile gloves, some people are sensitive to latex.

The dyes you use depend on the specimen. For example in histological slides of tissues hematoxylin and eosin are most commonly used (short HE-stain). That's what you most likely saw on your slides, it's blue, purple and pink. Hematoxylin is a basic compound extracted and oxidised from the��logwood tree (Haematoxylum campechianum), and it stains acidic compounds in the cells (or basophilic because they have an affinity for basic substances). For example nucleic acids like DNA or RNA get stained by hematoxylin because they are basophillic. And where are lots of nucleic acids? In the nucleus and ribosomes, that is why they appear blue to purple in the staining because they bind hematoxylin. Eosin is an acidic compound, and stains basic or acidophilic compounds red or pinkish, like proteins, collagen, cytoplasm, extracellular matrix.

(Ductus epididymidis with HE-stain)

(Tongue HE-stain, pointer marking a ganglion; that is my picture)

Of course there are more specific stains for specific tissues like Golgi's silver staining for neurons.

For plants toluidine blue is often used, high affinity for acidic tissues, and can stain blue to green to purple. It is often combined with safranin, a basic azine, which is probably the red stain you saw. It stains polysaccharides and lignin, woody parts of the plant. Safranin and astrablue is also often combined, astrablue stains non-lignified parts of the plant.

(Ulex europaeus stem; not my pictures I don't have any samples currently, source Atlas of plant and animal histology)

Safranin is also used in bacteriology, in the famous Gram staining. In Gram staining you use crystal violet (blue/purple), Lugol's iodine solution, then wash it with ethanol and add safranin (red) as a counter stain. Bacteria is gram-positive if the crystal violet stays in their thick murein cell wall, can't be washed out with the ethanol and the bacteria stays blue. Gram-negative appear red because of the counterstain.

(Staphyloccocus aureus (violet, gram positive) & Escherichia coli (red, gram negative); not my picture, source Wikipedia)

However, I am not sure whether you have access to any of those substances, if they are too expensive for you or if they are too hazardous if used in your own room for a prolongued time. Of course those substances need to be stored properly, and your own room is probably not a good place, especially for ethanol or acetone. The fumes. I would recommend to ask your biology or chemistry teacher whether they can recommend anything further and where to buy said solutions in your area, and if they can't they are idiots. There are also many useful resources and tutorials on Youtube.

Another fascinating experiment for your microscope, that you can perform without buying any chemicals, is a hay infusion. You put hay into a container filled with water, and let it sit undisturbed for a week in a sunny area but not in direct harsh sunlight. During that time the microorganisms in the hay are reproducing in the solution, feeding on the polysaccharides of the hay. Protozoans also flourish in the hay infusion and eat the bacteria. It might get cloudy and a bit foul smelling (best not do it in your own room if you don't want to sleep next to a rotting smell). When you put a drop of the solution onto a slide and look at it in the microscope, you should see a variety of microorganisms like bacteria (like Bacillus subtilis), amoeba, ciliates, heliozoa, algae et cetera. At different depths of the liquid you should find different kinds of organisms, because of differing oxygen content. However, pathogens can also occur in the hay infusion so handle it carefully and work sterile, wash your hands properly.

And even if you don't work at a morgue you can still get tissue samples to experiment on, after all meat is sold in supermarkets, basically the same as a human body. And at the butchers they even sell organs like chicken hearts, pig kidney, liver, blood et cetera. Or observe your own hair under the microscope.

Which kind of samples and slides were included in your starter kit? Be careful to not leave them lying around in the sunlight, or the stain might fade. Always store them in the proper box.

[athenese-dx]

𝗔𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗻𝗲𝘀𝗲-𝗗𝘅'𝘀 𝗠𝗼𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿 𝗗𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗥𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝘀!

Athenese-Dx MolDx ranges are engineered for precision, accuracy, and reliability. Our comprehensive suite includes:

1. DNA/RNA Extraction Kits – High-yield & pure nucleic acid extraction 2. Nucleic Acid Extractor – Automated, fast, and efficient workflow

𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹-𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗣𝗖𝗥 𝗞𝗶𝘁𝘀:

1. HBV & HCV (Quantitative) – Accurate viral load detection 2. Typhoid & Leptospira (Qualitative) – Rapid & reliable pathogen identification

Watch the video to learn more.

Visit → https://athenesedx.com/product-category/molecular-pcr-kits/

AtheneseDx #PCRKits #MolecularDiagnostics #IVD #India #PCR #RealTimePCR #NewProductLaunch #LaboratoryExcellence #DiagnosticSolutions #Diagnostics #Pathology #Medical #Medicine #Practitioner #ClinicalDiagnostics #ClinicalChemistry #ELISA #RapidTest #ClinicalLaboratory #RTPCR #Healthcare #InVitroDiagnostics #LabSupplies #LaboratorySupplies #DiagnosticKits

[agp]

hey if youre on turtle island or still tuesday and feel like trying a quick silly browser game you should check out tradle. (i think it updates at midnight based on time zones?) todays is real fun i prommy.

you get five guesses to figure out a country from its export data, and after each guess they tell you how far away you are and what direction the county youre looking for is. i know it sounds like a ridiculous challenge but this one has a bunch of easy hints and giveaways that are accessible to your average westerner

if its wednesday by now or you want to see the data presented differently check out this silly economy under the cut (bolded 'spoilers' ig)

total export value: 371b (usd)

gold: 86.7b (23%}

packaged meds: 48.5b (13%)

vaccines, blood, cultures, etc: 40.3b (11%)

base metal watches: 15.2b (4%)

nitrogen heterocyclic compounds: 14.2b (4%)

jewlery: 9.35b (2.5%)

precious metal watches: 8.97b (2.5%)

orthopedic appliances: 7.02b (2%)

hormones: 3.38b

coffee: 3.36b

electricity: 3.19b

medical instruments: 3.09b

machinery w indv functions: 3.04b

platinum: 2.54b

chemical analysis instruments: 2.27b

nucleic acids: 2.17b

valves: 2.17b

silver: 2.01b

electric motors: 1.78b

scented mixtures: 1.72b

sulfonamides: 1.71b

diamonds: 1.64b

planes, helicopters, and spacecraft: 1.63b

beauty products: 1.58b

other heating machinery: 1.43b

flavored water: 1.43b

gas turbines: 1.38b

low voltage protection eq: 1.34b

gas and liquid flow measuring inst: 1.3b

carboxyamide compounds: 1.26b

other measuring instruments: 1.24b

air pumps: 1.16b

motor vehicles, parts, and acc: 1.14b

petroleum gas: 1.12b

electrical transformers: 1.11b

aluminum plating: 1.07b

other plastic products: 1.01b

metal working machine parts: 988m

vitamins: 965m

polyamides: 963m

washing and bottling machines: 925m

chocolate: 887m

oxygen amino compounds: 885m

integrated circuits: 884m

iron fasteners: 881m

paintings: 873m

transmissions: 855m

special pharmaceuticals: 837m

insulated wire: 828m

electrical power accessories: 826m

plastic lids: 818m

cheese: 800m

antibiotics: 797m

liquid pumps: 797m

cars: 789m

ink: 752m

non mechanical removal machinery: 737m

trunks and cases: 734m

centrifuges: 730m

interchangeable tool parts: 728m

high voltage protection eq: 705m

hand saws: 693m

other edible preparations: 680m

electric heaters: 679m

electrical control boards: 672m

polyacetals: 664m

plastic pipes: 636m

electric soldering equipment: 616m

precious metal compounds: 608m

industrial fatty acids, oils, and alcohols: 608m

hot rolled iron bars: 590m

self propelled rail transport: 582m

refined petroleum: 577m

hydrazine or hydroxylamine derivatives: 565m

precious stones: 563m

rubber working machinery: 561m

unpackaged meds: 557m

other iron products: 553m

precious metal scraps 550m

computers: 545m

surveying equipment: 523m

other plastic sheetings: 519m

metal finishing machines: 516m

scrap copper: 514m

semiconductor devices: 511m

raw plastic sheeting: 494m

documents or title and stamps: 490m

rolled tobacco: 487m

malt extract: 469m

other electrical machinery: 467m

other paper machinery: 450m

oxygen heterocyclic compounds: 441m

non knit mens suits: 441m

synthetic coloring matter: 436m

locomotive parts: 432m

non knit womens suits: 428m

iron structures: 424m

leather footwear: 421m

industrial printers: 415m

lifting machinery: 415m

scrap iron: 412m

therapeutic appliances: 410m

office machine parts: 410m

other clocks and watches: 405m

metal molds: 403m

other furniture: 403m

glaziers putty: 377m

liquid dispersing machines: 376m

knitting machine accessories: 370m

other small iron pipes: 369m

broadcasting equipment: 367m

aircraft parts: 363m

industrial food prep machinery: 362m

glues: 357m

pesticides: 349m

oscilloscopes: 344m

raw aluminum: 344m

knit sweaters: 339m

optical fibers and bundles: 334m

excavation machinery: 332m

non iron/steel slag ash and residue: 319m

carboxylic acids: 315m

xray equipment: 315m

electric motor parts: 315m

watch straps: 313m

tanks and armoured vehicles: 310m

forging machines: 309m

cleaning products: 306m

metalworking transfer machines: 298m

animal food: 294m

combustion engines: 282m

engine parts: 271m

electric generating sets: 254m

scrap aluminum: 249m

laboratory reagents: 249m

perfumes: 244m

other rubber products: 241m

photo lab equipment: 240m

wheat: 236m

lubricating products: 234m

printed circuit boards: 233m

aluminum bars: 230m

explosive ammunition: 230m

brooms: 224m

lcds: 223m

refrigerators: 223m

motorcycles and cycles: 221m

large construction vehicles: 221m

coal briquettes: 221m

corn: 220m

aluminum cans: 219m

textile footwear: 217m

thermostats: 207m

coffee and tea extracts: 206m

other aluminum products: 204m

ball bearings: 203m

knives: 199m

machines for additive mnf: 195m

raw iron bars: 187m

delivery trucks: 185m

milling stones: 176m

aluminum foil: 170m

collectors items: 169m

soybean oil: 169m

wood fiberboard: 166m

other stainless steel bars: 164m

sculptures: 160m

cutting blades: 159m

baked goods: 150m

navigation equipment: 146m

hydrometers: 137m

watch cases and parts: 134m

laboratory ceramic wear: 134m

wood carpentry: 124m

mirrors and lenses: 117m

[pathologylab]

Introducing G2M’s newly launched EZY-AutoPrep—an automated #NGS library preparation workstation capable of constructing 24 sample libraries in a single run. With user-friendly software and supporting hardware, EZY-#AutoPrep ensures quick sample processing, delivering a seamless library preparation experience. Features include heating, cooling, #magnetic plate lifting, #PCR cycling, UV sterilization, and efficient purification which ensures precise, contamination-free library construction.

#Revolutionize your #NGS workflow with EZY-AutoPrep.

Visit our website for more information: https://genes2me.com/automated-ngs-library-sample-preparation

For more details, Call us at +91-8800821778 or drop us an email at social@genes2me.com

#rtpcr #genes2me #nextgenerationsequencing #nextgeneration #sequencing #automated #ivd #dna #rna #protocols #nucleicacid

[materialsscienceandengineering]

Periodic Table Championship: Round 2, Day 1, Nitrogen vs. Tin

The seventh match of day 1 of round 2 of the championship has element 7, nitrogen, facing off against element 50, tin. Last round, nitrogen beat darmstadtium with 82.8% of the votes, while tin had a slightly closer match, beating dysprosium with 70.6% of the votes. A reminder of our challengers:

Nitrogen is a nonmetal that exists in diatomic form. About 78% of Earth’s atmosphere is nitrogen gas and it occurs in all known biological organisms in the form of amino acids and nucleic acids (DNA and RNA). It is well known as a component of fertilizers and explosives. Its name comes from the French for nitre producing, though several languages still use alternative names, including azote, from the Greek for no life (as nitrogen gas is an asphyxiant).

Tin is a soft post-transition metal that has a near room temperature solid-state phase transformation, crystalizing as malleable beta tin with a body centered tetragonal crystal structure above ~13°C (56°F) and brittle alpha tin with a diamond cubic crystal structure below. The first evidence of tin extraction comes from the Bronze age, and is well known for its use in alloys such as bronze, pewter, and bell metal. The origin of the name comes from Germanic languages, while the symbol comes from the Latin term for the metal, stannum.

[vishvajit123]

The global Proteinase K market analysis covers its size, segmentation, regional insights, company share, key player profiles, and market forecast from 2025 to 2035.

Proteinase K Market Analysis, Trends, and Forecast (2025-2035)

Industry Outlook

The Proteinase K Market was valued at USD 4.88 Billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 12.15 Billion by 2035, growing at a CAGR of approximately 8.65% from 2025 to 2035. The market comprises global production volumes and demand for broad-spectrum serine protease, extensively used in biotechnology, diagnostics, and molecular biology.

Proteinase K plays a crucial role in DNA and RNA extraction, protein digestion, and clinical sample preparation. It is available in microbial-origin, animal-origin, and recombinant forms, catering to pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology firms, research institutes, diagnostic laboratories, and forensic investigation agencies. The rising adoption of Proteinase K in pharmaceutical manufacturing, food safety testing, and criminal forensics is driving market expansion, supported by advancements in recombinant enzyme technology and increasing R&D investments.

Get free sample Research Report - https://www.metatechinsights.com/request-sample/2160

Market Dynamics

Growing Demand for Molecular Diagnostics

Molecular diagnostics serve as a key driver of the Proteinase K market due to its indispensable role in DNA and RNA extraction. The surge in infectious diseases, genetic disorders, and cancer cases has heightened demand for rapid diagnostic techniques. PCR, RT-PCR, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) heavily rely on Proteinase K for pathogen detection, mutation analysis, and hereditary disease identification.

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly boosted the use of molecular diagnostics, increasing the application rates of Proteinase K. Modern point-of-care testing and liquid biopsy methods further expand its role in non-invasive diagnostics, enhancing precision medicine applications. Emerging technologies and government support for molecular research will continue to drive market growth.

Rising Biopharmaceutical Production

Biopharmaceutical production heavily relies on Proteinase K for impurity removal in monoclonal antibodies, recombinant proteins, and gene therapies. The increasing demand for biologic medicines and biosimilars, particularly for cancer and autoimmune treatments, is fueling the need for high-quality processing enzymes.

Proteinase K is widely used in cell culture processing, viral vector purification, and protein characterization. Regulatory authorities like the FDA and EMA enforce strict purification standards, pushing pharmaceutical companies toward Proteinase K adoption. The expansion of contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs) and bioprocessing facilities further drives market demand.

High Production and Purification Costs

One of the primary restraints in the Proteinase K market is the high cost of production and purification. Recombinant and purified Proteinase K variants require advanced fermentation technologies, stringent quality assurance processes, and costly culture mediums.

Liquid enzyme formulations necessitate controlled temperature storage, adding to transportation and logistical expenses. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face significant challenges in market penetration due to financial constraints. Affordability issues in developing economies also limit widespread adoption, although technological advancements are gradually lowering costs.

Expansion of Personalized Medicine

The rise of personalized medicine is creating new growth opportunities for the Proteinase K market. Genetic profiling, NGS, and PCR-based diagnostics depend on Proteinase K for accurate DNA/RNA extraction, making it vital for precision medicine.

Companion diagnostics, which guide tailored treatments based on genetic markers, rely on pure nucleic acid material, increasing Proteinase K consumption. AI-driven genetic research and bioinformatics advancements further enhance its usage. Public and private funding in precision medicine is expected to propel market expansion in the coming years.

Increasing Demand for Recombinant Proteinase K

Recombinant Proteinase K is gaining traction due to its superior stability, high purity, and consistent enzymatic properties. Unlike microbial or animal-derived variants, recombinant Proteinase K offers contamination-free production, making it highly suitable for pharmaceuticals, diagnostics, and molecular biology applications.

This variant functions efficiently under extreme conditions, supporting DNA/RNA extraction, NGS, and PCR applications. Regulatory agencies mandate recombinant enzyme usage to eliminate contamination risks, further fueling market demand. With scalable and sustainable production techniques, recombinant Proteinase K is poised for substantial growth in industrial and research applications.

Read Full Research Report https://www.metatechinsights.com/industry-insights/proteinase-k-market-2160

Segment Analysis

By Source

Microbial-Derived Proteinase K

Animal-Derived Proteinase K

Recombinant Proteinase K (Dominant Segment)

Recombinant Proteinase K leads the market due to its high stability, purity, and regulatory approval for molecular diagnostics and biopharmaceutical applications.

By Form

Powder (Dominant Segment)

Liquid

Powdered Proteinase K dominates the market as it offers enhanced stability, longer shelf life, and convenient storage. It is extensively used in molecular biology applications, NGS, and biopharmaceutical production.

Regional Analysis

North America

North America holds a significant share in the Proteinase K market due to the widespread adoption of molecular diagnostics, forensic science, and biopharmaceutical production. The U.S. leads in market growth, driven by advanced research facilities, strong biopharma presence, and regulatory mandates favoring recombinant enzymes.

Asia-Pacific

The Asia-Pacific region is witnessing rapid market expansion, fueled by growing investments in biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors. Countries like China, India, and Japan are heavily investing in life sciences research, precision medicine, and molecular diagnostics.

Increasing healthcare expenditures and the rising prevalence of genetic and infectious diseases are boosting market demand. The expansion of contract research organizations (CROs) and biomanufacturing facilities is also contributing to market growth.

Competitive Landscape

The Proteinase K market is highly competitive, with major players focusing on innovation, partnerships, and product line expansions. Key market participants include:

Thermo Fisher Scientific

Merck KGaA

QIAGEN

F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

New England Biolabs

Companies are investing in R&D to enhance Proteinase K applications in molecular diagnostics, biopharmaceutical manufacturing, and forensic science. Strategic collaborations with research institutions are also driving innovation in enzyme applications.

Buy Now https://www.metatechinsights.com/checkout/2160

Recent Developments

October 2023 – Sigma-Aldrich launched a new Proteinase K product to enhance nucleic acid extraction in research laboratories.

[healthcare-updates-with-sns]

Life Science Tools Market: Regional Analysis and Forecast 2024-2032

The Life Science Tools Market size was estimated at USD 158.40 billion in 2023 and is expected to reach USD 407.57 billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 11.09% during the forecast period of 2024-2032. This significant growth is driven by technological advancements and increasing demand for innovative solutions in diagnostics, drug development, and genomics.

Regional Analysis

In 2023, North America held the largest share of the life science tools market, with the U.S. leading the charge. This dominance is attributed to the region's advanced healthcare infrastructure, substantial R&D investments, and strong presence of key life science companies. The increasing adoption of genomics, next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, and personalized medicine further strengthens North America's market position.

The Asia-Pacific region is projected to experience the highest growth rate during the forecast period, driven by expanding healthcare infrastructure, rising healthcare expenditure, and increasing government funding for biotechnology and life sciences research.

Get Free Sample Report @ https://www.snsinsider.com/sample-request/3833

Market Segmentation

The life science tools market is segmented based on product, technology, and end-user:

By Product:

NGS

Sanger Sequencing

Nucleic Acid Preparation

Nucleic Acid Microarray

PCR & qPCR

Flow Cytometry

Mass Spectrometry

Separation Technologies

Electron Microscopy

NMR

Others

By Technology:

Genomic Technology

Cell Biology Technology

Proteomics Technology

Lab Supplies & Technologies

Others

By End-User:

Biopharmaceutical Companies

Government & Academic Institutions

Healthcare

Others

Key Players

Agilent Technologies, Inc. – DNA Microarrays, Liquid Chromatography Systems, Mass Spectrometers, PCR Tools, Microfluidics, Flow Cytometry Instruments

Becton, Dickinson, and Company (BD) – Flow Cytometers, Cell Sorters, Culture Media & Reagents, Automated Liquid Handling Systems, Syringes, and Needles (for laboratory use)

F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. – PCR Machines, Mass Spectrometry Systems, Laboratory Reagents, Immunoassay Analyzers, DNA Sequencers, Clinical Diagnostics Instruments

Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. – PCR and qPCR Systems, Electrophoresis Equipment, Western Blotting Systems, Cell Biology Reagents, Chromatography Systems, Life Science Reagents

Danaher Corporation – Flow Cytometry Instruments, PCR Systems, Laboratory Automation Equipment, Life Science Reagents, Microscopes, Spectrophotometers

Illumina, Inc. – DNA Sequencers (Next-Generation Sequencing), Microarrays, Bioinformatics Software, PCR Reagents, Genomic Assays

Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. – PCR and qPCR Systems, Mass Spectrometers, Chromatography Equipment, Flow Cytometers, Cell Culture Reagents, DNA and RNA Analysis Kits

QIAGEN N.V. – PCR Kits and Reagents, DNA/RNA Extraction Kits, Automated Workstations, Sequencing Solutions, Assay Development Kits

Merck KGaA – Cell Culture Media, PCR Reagents, Microarray Tools, Chromatography Systems, Spectroscopy Equipment, Protein Analysis Kits

Shimadzu Corporation – Chromatography Systems, Mass Spectrometers, Spectrophotometers, PCR Equipment, Analytical Instruments

Hitachi, Ltd. – Mass Spectrometers, Fluorescence Microscopes, X-ray Systems for Biological Applications, Automated Laboratory Systems

Bruker Corporation – Mass Spectrometry Systems, NMR Spectrometers, X-ray Diffraction Systems, FTIR Spectrometers, Microscopy Equipment

Oxford Instruments plc – Microscopes (Electron and Atomic Force), Spectrometers, NMR Systems, Cryogenics for Life Science Applications

Zeiss International – Microscopes (Fluorescence, Confocal, Electron Microscopy), Imaging Solutions, Life Science Imaging Systems, Microscopy-based Analytical Tools

Key Points

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in drug discovery and genomics enhances research efficiency and accelerates drug development.

Automation in laboratories reduces manual errors and increases throughput, significantly improving operational efficiency.

Advancements in genomic technologies, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), are revolutionizing personalized medicine and diagnostics.

The growing emphasis on precision medicine necessitates advanced diagnostic and analytical tools, fueling market growth.

Increased government funding and support for life science research promote the development of next-generation tools.

Future Scope

The future of the life science tools market is poised for substantial growth, driven by continuous technological innovations and the increasing integration of AI and automation in research processes. The expanding applications of genomic technologies and the rising focus on personalized medicine are expected to further propel market expansion. Additionally, the growing investments in research and development, coupled with supportive government initiatives, will likely enhance the development and adoption of advanced life science tools globally.

Conclusion

The life science tools market is on a robust growth trajectory, fueled by technological advancements and the escalating demand for innovative research solutions. With significant contributions from North America and rapid growth anticipated in the Asia-Pacific region, the market is set to play a pivotal role in advancing healthcare research and personalized medicine in the coming years.

Contact Us: Jagney Dave - Vice President of Client Engagement Phone: +1-315 636 4242 (US) | +44- 20 3290 5010 (UK)

Other Related Reports:

Cell Viability Assay Market

Medical Power Supply Market

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Treatment Market

MRI Guided Neurosurgical Ablation Market

[walkingghotst]

North America Genomics Market Growth and Recent Trends by Forecast 2027

The North America Genomics market is expected to reach US$ 20,348.43 million in 2027 from US$ 7,669.34 million in 2019. The market is estimated to grow with a CAGR of 13.3% from 2020-2027.

NORTH AMERICA GENOMICS MARKET SEGMENTATION

North America Genomics Market: By Technology

Sequencing

Microarray

Polymerase Chain Reaction

Nucleic Acid Extraction and Purification

Others

North America Genomics Market: By Product and Services

Instruments/Systems

Consumables

Services

North America Genomics Market:By Application

Diagnostics

Drug Discovery and Development

Precision/Personalized Medicine

Agriculture & Animal Research

Others

North America Genomics Market: By End User

Research Centers

Hospitals & Clinics

Biotechnology & Pharmaceutical Companies

Others

North America Genomics Market: By Country

North America

US

Canada

Mexico

 North America Genomics Market: Company Profiles

Illumina, Inc.

Danaher

F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD.

BIO-RAD LABORATORIES INC.

General Electric Company

THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.

Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Eurofins Scientific

QIAGEN

BGI

Request sample PDF:

https://www.businessmarketinsights.com/sample/TIPRE00004301

North America Genomics Report Scope

Report Attribute        Details

Market size in 2019     US$ 7,669.34 Million

Market Size by 2027    US$ 20,348.43 Million

Global CAGR (2020 - 2027)     13.3%

Historical Data 2017-2018

Forecast period           2020-2027

Gaining a Competitive Edge: North America Genomics

Strategic insights for the North America Genomics market deliver a data-informed examination of the industry's configuration, encompassing current trends, major players, and regional specificities. These insights furnish actionable recommendations, empowering readers to gain a competitive advantage by pinpointing unexploited market niches or formulating distinctive value propositions. By leveraging data analytics, these insights assist industry participants – including investors and manufacturers – in foreseeing market shifts. A future-oriented perspective is paramount, enabling stakeholders to anticipate upcoming market evolutions and strategically position themselves for enduring success within this dynamic North American arena. Ultimately, incisive strategic intelligence equips readers to make well-considered decisions that boost profitability and achieve their commercial goals within the genomics landscape.

Localized Market Understanding: North America Genomics

Comprehending the geographic scope of the North American Genomics market is vital for business operations and competitive standing. Recognizing local variations, such as differing consumer inclinations (e.g., preferences for specific genomic services or data privacy protocols), shifting economic landscapes, and diverse regulatory frameworks, is essential for tailoring strategies for particular markets. Businesses can broaden their market penetration by identifying under-served areas or modifying their offerings to align with local needs. A defined market focus allows for more efficient deployment of resources, precisely targeted marketing initiatives, and enhanced positioning relative to regional competitors, ultimately stimulating expansion within these specific geographic areas.

Historic Data: 2017-2018   |   Base Year: 2019   |   Forecast Period: 2020-2027

Analysis By Technology (Sequencing, Microarray, Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), Nucleic Acid Extraction and Purification, and Others), Product & Service (Instruments/Systems, Consumables, and Services), Application (Diagnostics, Drug Discovery and Development, Precision/Personalized Medicine, Agriculture & Animal Research, and Others), End User (Research Centers, Hospitals and Clinics, Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Companies, and Others), and Country

About Us:

Business Market Insights is a market research platform that provides subscription service for industry and company reports. Our research team has extensive professional expertise in domains such as Electronics & Semiconductor; Aerospace & Defense; Automotive & Transportation; Energy & Power; Healthcare; Manufacturing & Construction; Food & Beverages; Chemicals & Materials; and Technology, Media, & Telecommunications

[global-research-report]

Molecular Weight Marker Market: Technological Advancements and Market Dynamics

 The global molecular weight marker market size is anticipated to reach USD 1.54 billion by 2030, according to a new report by Grand View Research, Inc. The market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 12.0% from 2024 to 2030. Increasing investment in R&D by companies including biotechnology and biologics is the major factor that drives the growth during the forecast period. These markers are used by researchers and companies for various applications such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), Northern blotting, Southern blotting, and molecular cloning. Thus, the increasing application of these products in R&D is expected to boost growth.

Increasing focus on molecular biology research is another major factor supporting market growth. Molecular biology research is important to understand interactions between the different systems of a cell, including DNA, RNA, and protein biosynthesis & regulation. Thus, these research activities are very high in developed countries and are growing at a high pace in developing countries including China and India. Hence, there is a growing demand for molecular weight markers for research activities, which is expected to fuel the growth.

Molecular Weight Marker Market Report Highlights

DNA markers dominated the market and accounted for a share of 45.6% in 2023. These DNA markers are also known as molecular markers or DNA sequencing. 

Prestained markers accounted for the largest market revenue share of 52.3% in 2023 and is expected to register the fastest CAGR during the forecast period. 

Nucleic acid applications accounted for the largest market revenue share of 66.4% in 2023. The applications of nucleic acid-based can be seen as a vaccine and as a gene-editing tool. 

North America’s molecular weight marker market dominated in 2023. The rising prevalence of chronic diseases such as cancer is expected to drive the market growth.

Molecular Weight Marker Market Segmentation

Grand View Research has segmented the global molecular weight marker market report based on product, application, end-use, and region:

Molecular Weight Marker Product Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2018 - 2030)

DNA markers

Below 50 bp

50 bp t100 bp

100 bp t1 kb

1 kb t5 kb

Above 5 kb

Protein markers

Below 10 kDa

10 k Da t100 kDa

10 k Da t100 kDa

100 k Da t200 kDa

Above 200 kDa

RNA markers

Molecular Weight Marker Type Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2018 - 2030)

Prestained markers

Unstained markers

Specialty markers

Molecular Weight Marker Application Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2018 - 2030)

Nucleic acid applications

PCR

Sequencing

Northern blotting

Southern blotting

Molecular cloning

Others

Protein applications

Western Blotting

Gel extraction

Others

Molecular Weight Marker End Use Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2018 - 2030)

Academic and research institutes

Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies

CROs

Others

Molecular Weight Marker Regional Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2018 - 2030)

North America

US

Canada

Mexico

Europe

Germany

UK

France

Asia Pacific

China

Japan

India

South Korea

Australia

Latin America

Brazil

Middle East and Africa (MEA)

KSA

UAE

South Africa

Key Players in the Molecular Weight Marker Market

Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.

F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd

Merck KGaA

QIAGEN

TAKARA BIO, INC.

Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.

Promega Corp

New England Biolabs

Agilent Technologies

Danaher

Order a free sample PDF of the Molecular Weight Marker Market Intelligence Study, published by Grand View Research.